Job offers in Saudi Arabia: A court ruling clarifying the candidate's rights

Job offer and compensation: A decisive Saudi court ruling

25.02.2026
7 mins read
The Labor Court of Appeal upheld the rejection of compensation for a candidate who did not start work. Learn about the legal difference between a job offer and an employment contract in Saudi Arabia and the implications of this decision.

In a landmark ruling that reinforces the legal principles governing the Saudi labor market, the Labor Court of Appeal upheld a judgment dismissing a compensation claim filed by a job candidate against a company, despite the candidate having received a formal job offer. This ruling puts an end to the debate surrounding the legal nature of a job offer, confirming that it does not constitute a binding employment contract unless it is accompanied by actual commencement of work.

General context and legal background

This case hinges on the fundamental distinction in the Saudi labor system between a “job offer” and an “employment contract.” A job offer is a preliminary step, an expression of the employer’s intention to hire under specific conditions (such as salary, job title, and benefits), and constitutes an offer awaiting the candidate’s acceptance. An employment contract, on the other hand, is the final legal document that establishes a fully-fledged contractual relationship, precisely defining the rights and obligations of both parties. It only becomes effective upon the signatures of both parties and the employee’s commencement of duties. Historically, labor courts have seen numerous cases centered on this point, where candidates seek compensation after making decisions based on job offers, such as leaving their previous jobs, before the offer is withdrawn or the hiring process is not completed for any reason.

The importance of the decision and its expected impact

This decision is of paramount importance to all parties involved in the employment relationship in the Kingdom, and its impact can be summarized in several points:

  • Protecting employers: The ruling provides legal protection for companies against undue compensation claims and gives them greater flexibility in managing recruitment processes. Companies often need to conduct additional checks or meet regulatory requirements after making a job offer and before signing the final contract.
  • Raising awareness among job seekers: This decision sends a clear message to candidates and job seekers that a job offer is not a guarantee. They should exercise caution and refrain from taking crucial steps, such as resigning from their current jobs, until they have signed a formal employment contract and confirmed all the details of their employment.
  • Establishing judicial stability: The ruling contributes to unifying judicial principles in similar cases, which enhances the stability of the legislative environment for the labor market, which is one of the main objectives of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030, which seeks to make the Saudi market an attractive environment for both investments and talents.

In conclusion, this judicial ruling confirms that the employment contractual relationship effectively begins from the date of commencement of work and signing of the contract, and that the stages preceding this, including the job offer, remain within the framework of preliminary procedures that are not obligatory for compensation if they are not completed.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Go up