The truth about Al-Ahli's penalty against Neom: A refereeing expert explains

The truth about Al-Ahli's penalty against Neom: A refereeing expert explains

24.01.2026
6 mins read
Learn about the opinion of refereeing expert Ahmed Abu Khadija regarding the controversy surrounding Al-Ahli's penalty kick against Neom in the Roshan League, and whether Ibanez deserved the foul. Details of the decision and the VAR intervention.

In an incident that sparked considerable controversy in Saudi sports circles, Jordanian refereeing expert Ahmed Abu Khadija settled the debate surrounding Al-Ahli's right to a penalty kick during their crucial match against Neom FC. This match was part of the 18th round of the Saudi Professional League (Roshan League) and was held at Neom Stadium in Tabuk, amidst a large crowd and great anticipation for the outcome.

In an exclusive statement to Al-Midan Al-Riyadi newspaper, Abu Khadija confirmed that the referee's decision not to award a penalty to Al-Ahli was entirely correct and appropriate. The refereeing expert explained the technical details of the incident, pointing out that the contact inside the penalty area was actually a foul committed by Al-Ahli defender Rogerio Ibanez, and not a foul in his favor as Al-Ahli players claimed. He added that the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology played a crucial role in providing the referee with the best angle and view to make the most suitable decision, thus enhancing the fairness of the competition.

The pitch witnessed moments of tension and strong protests from Al Ahli players and their German coach, Matthias Jäsle, who demanded the referee consult VAR and award the foul in their favor, attempting to change the course of the match, which comes at a crucial point in the season. Such refereeing decisions are an integral part of the excitement of football, especially in a league as prestigious as the Roshan League, which has garnered global attention.

This match comes amidst fierce competition, as Al-Ahli strives to improve its position in the standings and seriously contend for the top spots that qualify for continental championships, given the tremendous development of Saudi football and its attraction of some of the world's best players. Every point in these rounds is crucial, as there is no room for error for the top teams aspiring to championship titles.

On the other hand, this refereeing controversy and the reliance on video technology reflect the significant technological advancements in managing Saudi League matches, and the commitment of those in charge of the competition to applying the highest standards of fairness and transparency. Refereeing decisions, whether in favor of or against teams, remain a rich source of discussion and technical and fan analysis after each round, further intensifying the competition and the passion of the followers.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Go up