Refereeing expert: The expulsion of the Al-Shabab player against Al-Nassr was incorrect

Refereeing expert: The expulsion of the Al-Shabab player against Al-Nassr was incorrect

January 17, 2026
7 mins read
A refereeing expert has revealed a surprising detail regarding Vincent Ciero's sending off in the Al-Nassr vs. Al-Shabab match in the Saudi Professional League. Learn the details of the incident and why the decision was deemed unfair in this exciting Riyadh derby.

The referee's decision in the Riyadh derby between Al-Nassr and Al-Shabab sparked widespread controversy in Saudi sports circles, particularly regarding the red card shown to Al-Shabab player Vincent Ciero. Jordanian refereeing expert Ahmed Abu Khadija offered a dissenting opinion, asserting that the red card issued to the player during the thrilling match between the two teams in the sixteenth round of the Saudi Professional League at Al-Awwal Park Stadium was incorrect.

The refereeing expert's opinion on Ciero's expulsion

In an exclusive interview with Al-Midan Al-Riyadi newspaper, Abu Khadija explained the details of the controversial incident, pointing out that Vincent Ciero's tackle on Al-Nassr player Kingsley Coman did not warrant the second yellow card that led to his dismissal. The refereeing expert stated, "The decision to send off Vincent Ciero was incorrect; the foul on Kingsley Coman did not warrant a second yellow card. The referee's decision was wrong, and he should have consulted VAR and reviewed the incident thoroughly before making such a significant decision.".

The impact of the numerical disadvantage on the course of the derby

The derby matches between Al-Nassr and Al-Shabab are considered among the fiercest in Saudi football, always characterized by intense rivalry, excitement, and close technical skill. The red card shown to Ciiro had a significant impact on Al-Shabab's tactics, forcing them to finish the match with ten men against a star-studded Al-Nassr side. Playing with a numerical disadvantage in such high-stakes matches puts immense pressure on the defense and reduces the team's chances of a comeback, a fact that Al-Nassr exploited to their advantage despite the valiant fight put up by Al-Shabab's players until the final whistle.

The context of the competition in the Roshan Professional League

This match comes at a crucial time in the Roshan League, as Al-Nassr seeks to continue its pursuit of the top spot and compete strongly for the title, while Al-Shabab aims to improve its position and return to contention for Asian Champions League qualification. Al-Nassr's 3-2 victory earned the team three valuable points, but the refereeing controversy has reopened the debate surrounding the standard of officiating in major matches, especially given the tremendous development of the Saudi League and its attraction of some of the world's best players. This places referees under intense scrutiny and analysis from both experts and fans alike.

It is worth noting that refereeing errors remain part of the game of football, but demands are constantly increasing for the optimal use of video technology to ensure fairness and avoid decisions that may change the course of tournaments, especially in a league that enjoys unprecedented global attention.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Go up